Our degenerates go a healthy 16-8 on the weekend netting a +$560 to their virtual coffers….Shannon and Riley both manage the perfect 3-0 against the spread for Week 4, while only Hunter and Shawn continued in the wrong direction….Gasper still leads overall with an 81.82% winning percentage over four weeks, but Miller (75%) and Riley (73%) are close behind….full results after the break.
| Week 4 | ||||||
| Shannon | NO -6½ | WIN | ||||
| TEN/CLE +37½ | WIN | Win % | $$ | |||
| NYJ/BAL +40 | WIN | 66.67% | $280 | |||
| WEEK | 3 | 0 | 0 | |||
| SEASON | 8 | 4 | 0 | |||
| Gasper | ATL -4 | LOSE | ||||
| NO -7 | WIN | Win % | $$ | |||
| NYG/ARI +44 | WIN | 81.82% | $580 | |||
| WEEK | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||
| SEASON | 9 | 2 | 1 | |||
| Burgess | TEN +1½ | WIN | ||||
| NE -4½ | WIN | Win % | $$ | |||
| NYJ/BAL -40½ | LOSE | 58.33% | $80 | |||
| WEEK | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||
| SEASON | 7 | 5 | 0 | |||
| Hunter | USF -2½ | LOSE | ||||
| PIT +4 | LOSE | Win % | $$ | |||
| NE -4½ | WIN | 36.36% | ($420) | |||
| WEEK | 1 | 2 | 0 | |||
| SEASON | 4 | 7 | 1 | |||
| Shawn | NYG -1 | WIN | ||||
| OAK +4 ½ | LOSE | Win % | $$ | |||
| MIA +9 | LOSE | 41.67% | ($320) | |||
| WEEK | 1 | 2 | 0 | |||
| SEASON | 5 | 7 | 0 | |||
| Riley | WAS +1 | WIN | ||||
| NE -4 | WIN | Win % | $$ | |||
| NO -7 | WIN | 72.73% | $380 | |||
| WEEK | 3 | 0 | 0 | |||
| SEASON | 8 | 3 | 1 | |||
| Kevin | GB -13 | WIN | ||||
| NE -4½ | WIN | Win % | $$ | |||
| ATL -4 | LOSE | 60.00% | $80 | |||
| WEEK | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||
| SEASON | 6 | 4 | 2 | |||
| Miller | NE -4½ | WIN | ||||
| NYG -1 | WIN | Win % | $$ | |||
| MIN -1 | LOSE | 75.00% | $480 | |||
| WEEK | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||
| SEASON | 9 | 3 | 0 | |||